In the realm of personality and cognitive assessments, two models stand out for their insightful approaches: Dr. Katherine Benziger’s physiological model focuses on brain function, and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)(r) which seeks to understand your instinctive preferences. Interestingly, both models caution against the same critical pitfall: working against your natural inclinations or ‘falsifying your type.’ This blog post aims to explore the similarities between these two paradigms and the high price one pays when ignoring their natural inclinations.
Common Ground: Benziger vs. Myers-Briggs
| Aspect | Dr. Katherine Benziger’s Model | Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)(r) |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental Approach | Physiological and neurological assessment | Psychometric test based on Carl Jung’s theories |
| Key Focus | Brain function and energy consumption | Personality preferences |
| Consequences of Falsifying Type | Leads to ‘Prolonged Adaption Stress Syndrome’ (PASS) | Diminished well-being and job satisfaction |
The Falsification Dilemma
In Benziger’s model, ‘falsifying type’ refers to acting against your innate thinking style, most often due to external pressures like job requirements. This creates physiological stress, which, if sustained, leads to ‘Prolonged Adaption Stress Syndrome’ (PASS). Symptoms include fatigue, memory impairment, and even alterations in brain chemistry.
Similarly, in MBTI(r), ‘falsifying type’ is akin to working in an environment that demands constant use of your non-preferred psychological functions. For instance, an Introverted, Intuitive, Feeling, and Perceiving (INFP) individual working in a highly regimented and detail-oriented role might find themselves experiencing stress, dissatisfaction, and even health issues over time.
The Underlying Principle: Working Against Nature is Costly
Both Benziger and MBTI(r) articulate that going against your natural inclinations is not only counterproductive but also damaging. Benziger outlines the physiological consequences, while MBTI suggests a decrease in job satisfaction and general well-being.
Table: Consequences of Falsifying Type in Both Models
| Consequences | Benziger’s Model | MBTI Model |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Health | Fatigue, altered brain chemistry | Not directly addressed but implied |
| Psychological Health | Stress, depression | Decreased job satisfaction, stress |
| Cognitive Effects | Memory impairment | Diminished focus and efficiency |
| Overall Well-being | Reduced due to PASS | Reduced due to a misalignment of job role and personality type |
The Practical Implications
- Career Choices: Both models emphasize the importance of aligning your job role with your natural inclinations. For Benziger, this means understanding your specialized brain function; for MBTI, it means understanding your personality type.
- Team Building and Management: Knowing the natural inclinations of your team can optimize performance and reduce workplace stress. Ignoring these factors can lead to decreased productivity and increased health issues.
- Personal Development: Understanding your natural strengths and weaknesses can help in personal growth and well-being.
In Closing
Both the Benziger and Myers-Briggs models offer valuable insights into human behavior and cognition. Understanding their similarities, particularly regarding the dangers of ‘falsifying type,’ can provide a more comprehensive strategy for personal and professional development. Whether it’s the physiological stress pinpointed by Benziger or the decline in well-being suggested by MBTI (r), the message is clear: ignoring your true self comes at a high cost.
Aligning your career and life choices with your innate preferences and brain functions isn’t just good practice; it’s essential for your long-term health and happiness.
Ken Meyer
Myers Briggs Master Practitioner and Retired Senior Career Coach at Eastern Michigan University
